Sunday, 20 May 2012

Pakistan to ban Twitter (and perhaps all other forms of communication?)

Pakistan has apparently banned the use of twitter due to its blasphemous content. Gasp – what dreadful thing was being tweeted? Well, Twitter was wickedly tweeting about a competition on Facebook involving caricatures of Mohammed (oh no, not again you may well ask).  Not sure why Pakistan hasn’t banned Facebook instead (whose shares opened at about $40 notwithstanding heavenly disapproval), but perhaps Facebook, now that they are listed and corporate, have to be more compliant in the face of righteous fury.

Perhaps Pakistan should consider banning pencils too. And while they are about it, evil pencil-sharpeners, drawing paper and pens too and all other tempting means by which people communicate non-verbally.  That would avoid any further blasphemous forms of communication and prevent people from daring to speak out about that which has been declared unspeakable.

Here is a quote from Salman Rushdie, who knows a thing or two about this sort of thing:

“The moment you declare a set of ideas to be immune from criticism, satire, derision, or contempt, freedom of thought becomes impossible.”

Sunday, 13 May 2012

Astrology - Debunking the nonsense….

Millions of people believe that practically everything about them, from the makeup of their personalities through to the events they will confront in their lives over the next 24 hours or months can, more or less, be foretold by the planets and stars.

I’ve always struggled with this. I mean, how it can possibly be that everything about a person can be foretold by the position of a lot of large stones and stars out there in space at the time of their birth. Makes no sense, in fact it’s so far-fetched and so devoid of a jot of any evidence to support it, that it must rank as one of the great hoaxes in history.
Trapped with its past?

Astrology has a very long history. It means the study or account of the stars, and its origins go back to ancient times. Initially it explained how the moon affected the tides and how the sun affected the seasons. All well and good. It all started getting a bit dodgy though when it moved from this into the area of horoscopes, relying upon human gullibility instead of celestial observation.
Astrology still largely treats the skies according to what was visible to the human eye at the time of Ancient Greeks and Babylonians.  Its Zodiac is unchanged over millennia. What about all the many new planets and other astronomical elements that have been discovered since and continue to be discovered? Surely they must have an impact upon the astrological affect?  What about black holes? What about near earth asteroids – presumably such potentially devastating phenomena would have quite an impact (excuse the pun) on horoscopes? (Just think of the impact they have had on Hollywood).
As a result, astrology has become a prisoner of its past – if it acknowledges that newly discovered planets and stars will affect its readings, in one stroke it automatically has to call into question its entire history of previous astrological predictions. Not so good for business or its credibility.

Consequently it must focus on finding ways in which it can’t be disproved, wrapping itself up in impenetrable pseudoscientific psychobabble.

How does it work?
I’ve always wondered that - just how does a planet affect my personality and the type of day I’m going to have? It makes no sense. Astrology birthed astronomy, but the child has been largely responsible for exposing its parent for the sham it is. No astrologer has ever been to explain how astrology works – just what is the extraordinary mechanism by which a planet, say, Jupiter, is able to exert an influence on you or I in our daily lives – what is the “it “ that is influencing us. Astrologists need to show some new law of nature at work. Some astrologists used to claim it was magnetism. But how does that affect events and behaviour? Besides, the pots and pans in your kitchen, your car engine or the change in your pocket, will exert more magnetic influence on you that a planet millions of miles away. Nope – that one falls at the first hurdle. There is no way it has yet been shown it can work.

Inconsistency and contradiction
Astrology is inconsistent – different astrologers give differing readings for the same event, contradicting each other. There is no properly controlled evidence of its reliability as a discipline. It cannot pass any properly controlled scientific test. 
Flawed assumption

Astrology’s key assumptions are also farcically flawed. Take Mars. Because it has iron oxide on its surface, Mars is seen as a red, “bloody” planet. Hence the easy association with aggressive and warlike character traits (Mars, the God of war etc.). This means that astrological predictions about daily events involving these character traits are a direct result of the fact that Mars has a lot of iron oxide on its surface.  Nope – I can’t really see much connection there either but I look forward to hearing about the relationship between Martian iron oxide and human conflict…….
Predicting the future doesn’t work

In short, astrology does not rely upon any of the laws of nature. It operates outside this, in the realm of pseudoscience.  It relies on the faith of its adherents, and its longevity is probably more to do with what is (or isn’t) going on inside its believers’ heads than what is happening out there in space or in the sequence of earthly events it purports to predict. Of course, a law of nature may suddenly be discovered which unexpectedly provides a basis to prove astrology works even if at some level. However, don’t hold your breath – as Carl Sagan said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Ultimately though, astrology fails the first and most basic test- it does not work and that is because it is nonsense. Astrology did not predict 9/11 or the Fukushima nuclear meltdown. It did not proudly tell us in advance who would score the final goal in the last football world cup. It will not predict the next natural disaster and like any of us, it can only guess how Hussein Bolt will feel when he wakes up on the morning of the 100 meter final in the forthcoming  Olympics in July (excited I predict).
 
It can’t do what it says on the tin. This is because the future cannot be read, whether with astrology, tea leaves or tarot cards. You will not find out about what lies in wait for you by listening to David Ick or by consulting the Mayan calendar. The future does not yet exist –and any person or any discipline that says they have a secret or specially revealed, magical way of knowing what it holds, is lying to us and to themselves.

Sunday, 6 May 2012

Hollande is elected...French mad man to the fore?

They have elected a socialist. His name is Mr Hollande.

Run.

If you believe the press. Mr Hollande apparently believes the rich are evil and must be taxed heavily for their obvious sins. He taps effortlessly into that painful assumption that modern and new-fangled is somehow immoral and cheap (and probably a nasty import from perfidious Albion) and responsible for the fading dreams of Gallic grandeur. He would like them all to be living in some socialist post enlightenment idyll where no one works (well, others somewhere else must work but let’s not worry about that) and if you are not on holiday, then you should be retired early. Ok, I’m exaggerating…slightly.

As one paper put it recently, Mr Hollande has already promised to spend money he has not yet even been able to borrow. Such is the rock upon which most socialist dreams flounder. Socialism is a wonderful hypothesis, yet the facts of history don’t bear it out. Humans by nature are greedy hunter gatherers who have always sought to accumulate goods and material wealth. Whether we like it or not, it is Capitalism that syncs most closely with this very fundamental and consistent aspect of human behaviour. 

But, back to France – it is not in a good place. Its banks resemble a cosmic phenomenon, most notably in that they have black holes instead of healthy balance sheets and they are light years from recovering their injudicious loans (notably to places like Greece and Italy). Many of its best and brightest have semi-grated to places like London and other northern European capitals where the wish to work hard (i.e. more than 35 hours a week) is not viewed as a character flaw and from which they can train-it back home at weekends. As a nation they seem preoccupied with their seemingly waning international influence as De Gaullism moves from the sunset into the shadows.

It has also recently been usurped by a resurgent Germany as the “political mover and shaker” in the Eurozone.  For years it has worried about the real or imagined loss of its influence, the way its culture is besieged by a sea of shallow and vacuous Anglo American imports, with their transient trends, pop fashions and associated vulgarities. Let’s not even get on to those “illegal foreign wars” or the irresistible tide of the English language. And to add insult to injury, the Far East now rises like a burning ultra-competitive sun on France’s horizon generating dark talk of trade tariffs and protectionism.

So what do you do when faced with all these problems – it appears you elect a man whose plan to save your sinking ship of state is to make a few more strategically placed economic holes in the hull. 

Because they are in such debt but still want to live beyond their means, Mr Hollande will borrow more money that will grow the bloated public sector a bit more. This he says will be good for growth, which has the logic of saying that eating more hamburgers is good for growth, even if not the kind you really want.

He says he will tax the very rich very heavily. For all that it is largely empty rhetoric, this has gone down very well indeed. In France no one likes the rich, although everyone wants the good life cushioned with generous state welfare paid for by that mythical sector of society known as “someone else”. There is an irony, not delicious but bitter and cynical, of resenting the rich but wanting the State to fund a standard of living you can’t afford – a trait by no means limited to France alone. No such thing as a free lunch, eh?

On the tax question, Mr Hollande, with all his talk of taxation and spending, risks becoming preoccupied with wealth distribution, as opposed to wealth creation. Like most politicians keen on embellishing their credentials with easy hand-outs, he prefers to ignore the reality that the distribution of wealth without equal attention to its creation is disastrous. If he is not careful, he will kill off the “golden goose” leading ultimately to wealth destruction. Just as you can’t dig your way out of a hole, you cannot tax your way out of a deficit. Over-taxation is like a bad smell in a small room. Those who are able, head for the door. In this case, the rich head for the exits (taking their proverbial sacks of wealth with them of course) and go and live somewhere else more welcoming like London (which is something like the 7th largest French city now).

He will also placate the electorate with bland, reassuring speeches – he will apply a growth policy, as if he thinks this is like applying another layer of make-up. He will tell Germany that he is going to renegotiate the Eurozone fiscal stability pact that ensures austerity. What does he think this pact is – some local arrangement like the window cleaning contract at the Éllysée Palace? He may find there are a few problems with this. Germany likes its pact (and everyone else’s austerity). It likes its low inflation. The pact is also already agreed by France, which is thus at its mercy.

Yet, Mr Hollande tells the French that nothing is as bad as they say, it’s almost as if he is telling them that if they bury their heads deep enough in the sand, then they won’t be able to see it all those dark clouds above their heads and they can remain safe in the dream of a unique French way of life. Yet that is but a nostalgic yearning for what is now passed.  It is as if Hollande promises them a last glance over the nation’s hunching shoulders, back to the sunlit, halcyon days of a youth passed but irresistible in its recall.

So we await the miracle of socialist economics. Perhaps he also believes that the earth is flat; confirmation is pending….